EMF headlines sometimes teeter on alarmism. Yet rigorous science offers a grounded view—and emphasizes informed precaution.

Section 1: Classification & Uncertainty

• WHO/IARC classify RF EMFs as "possibly carcinogenic" (Group 2B)—not definite, but worthy of continued study Wikipedia+2Biomolecular Therapy+2ScienceDirect.

• Exposure limits by ICNIRP and the FCC include safety buffers; precautionary use is recommended for vulnerable groups and long-term exposure Wikipedia.

Section 2: Mechanisms Hidden in Plain Sight

• Non-thermal mechanisms—ROS, calcium ion fluctuation, membrane disruption—point to subtle, systemic impacts rather than overt temperature increase PMC+2PubMed+2.

• Low-frequency EMFs may alter immune and thymus function depending on dose and duration Frontiers.

Section 3: Sifting Fact from Fear

• Studies on electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) show no clear link between symptoms and exposure in double-blind trials; psychological factors may contribute Wikipedia+1.

• Some epidemiological links exist (e.g., ELF fields and childhood leukemia), but remain inconclusive and under continued review Wikipedia+1.